The sun rises for everyone

""

Star Wars

V: The ‘Star Wars’ universe has just become pathetic. The original series of licenced fiction were bad, but the official materials in the past few years have just destroyed it. Well, the original films paint this picture of a gigantic, sprawling galaxy. Then the films and ancillary material make basically everyone important know everyone else. And then rigourously map out and explain as much as they can. Making the universe seem simple and trivial.

This is even without all the badness of the prequel films. The prequel films tried to normalise all these little interesting features of the original films. The original films hint at some allegorical parallels, but the prequel films just go over the top trying to cast each new species introduced with an existing ethnic group. So now all the flying things are Jews, the trade federation guys are all Chinese, the floppy eared guys are all Jamaicans. And it's this constant theme of racial essentialism. Humans are the only species which show any variation in accent, culture, or personality.

Then lots of weak fan service. The videogame lets you fight and beat Darth Vader. The television shows that Jabba the Hut is, like, Luke's brother-in-law, and Chewbacca bagged his groceries at the supermarket. Oh, and then lots of really stupid political content.

The ‘Battlestar Galactica’ prequel series ‘Caprica’ had this, too, which is what made it so incredibly boring. Very dull, simplistic political plots. It's like if you took the love triangle stories from any average soap opera and just replaced ‘X loves Y’ with ‘X is allied with Y‘. No consistency or realism, and just lots of names and dates to memorise, but no real thematic content.

This isn't even touching the bad acting and just general dumbness in plots. There's an episode of ‘Clone Wars’ where the main characters stumble across an enemy Jedi's base. And one of the supporting characters is, like, let's finish our main mission first. But, no, they decide to set a trap for the evil Jedi, but they do it so incompetently, the enemy Jedi side steps it trivially, and they have no real backup if he exploits the obvious flaw of their trap.

So he kills the supporting character and gets away. And at the end of the episode, the main characters are, like: "Man, war is so bad. We lost a good man today". Even though it was their own decisions and incompetence that precipitated everything that happened in the episode.

It's one of those shows where, like, the good guys will take a bad guy hostage without checking him for hidden weapons, and then the bad guy will conveniently escape at just the right moment to advance the plot.

One good example of how they take something that was interesting in the original movies and then beaten to death is Yodi's speech patterns. In the original movies, there is this conceit where he speaks in this sometimes reversed English. He is this oriental master of some sorts. But this is done very naturally as just a little ornamentation of the character. But in the movies and the series, they decided to make this a central feature. So now he always speaks in this exact same fashion, which just comes across as lame, clumsy, and annoying.

As you can see, it's such a stupid conceit, they can't actually give the character any good dialogue, because the addition of too many relative clauses would quickly make him incomprehensible. So it has this side-effect of disallowing the character from ever speaking more than the simplest of phrases.

Modern Slavery (in the Big Apple)

V: "The slave whips himself harder than the master, in hope of destroying the whip."

me: Sounds like some cheesy line from Ayn Rand

V: The opposite. It is mocking you for working hard to make money to not have to work.

me: No. Ayn Rand would mock you for not being a genius who righteously crack the whip on the huddled masses.

V: Well, she grew up under a brutal, insane regime - I can forgive her some madness.

me: It's the same incalculated personal exceptionalism experienced by the privileged

V: You're feisty today

me: I'm just being exceptional

V: It's surprising how little money means to me anymore.

me: According to Bloomberg, the average millionaire feel they need $7.5 Mln to feel secure. I am guessing you already have that amount of money.

V: No, but I have become numb to it since my days of poverty.

me: Numb in your palatial suite eh? In the city at the center of the world while making six digits? I can see how it all could feel like a dream.

V: Numb to the misery of middle class slavery

me: You sound like a proper ibanker, for a moment I thought you were going to row out the galley slave analogy and complain bitterly about how you have to work ten hours a day and then go home to your penthouse.

There is no better form of self-aggrandizement.

Power and Prerogative

9:39 PM

V: I wonder how this Net Neutrality thing will pan out.It is interesting, because I have difficulty conceiving of the telecom industry as being particularly astute in any fashion.

But it's quite amazing so far how much they seem to have accomplished. Well, let's ignore the actual merit of the arguments for a moment. Let's just look at who is on what side. Content providers all want net neutrality, because this is how can ensure their own survival. This means Google, Netflix, Hulu, Facebook...

Carriers wants net neutrality done away with, because this could lead to all sorts of market advantages in terms of optimising revenues or pushing their own content businesses.

I guess this could be a skewed portrayal, but it does really suggest a different type of management. It suggests on one side you have a bunch of much more agile and competitive companies trying to ensure a level playing field - that they do not have to compete in terms of basic access but in terms of services.

It gives this feeling that these carriers are just these lumbering giants who can only think in terms of their monopolies. I get this same impression from how some big media companies seem to operate. That they almost begrudge the need to create a product. That it is this burden for them to have to actually make something so that they can transfer money from your wallet to theirs, and if they could just find a way to charge you directly without this unnecessary intermediary of providing a good or service, they would happily do so.

I think that companies of this sort actually can be very successful and profitable, but that it's not sustainable. This kind of operation does not lend itself to astute or clever action, so these organisations have no ability to actually compete on merit.

This is a very interesting political battle, because it is really a fight between two large corporate groups. It isn't the public against corporations (since we already know that the public almost always loses in these cases.)

You too can be good if you have enough money from perpetrating evil

Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Is Lost to Tax Loopholes

I tend to treat organizations with purported good intentions with great skepticism, because it is easy to talk about those things when you have the money, money from tax evasion no less.

M01

me: Here is the operative anime formula: have a silly philosophical idea, inject some violence, add a boy meet girl situation and/or fan service. If that doesn't work then it means you haven't dialed it up far enough.

V: The counterpoint to anime structure is that regular western programmes are themselves so adolescent - western animated shows have no choice but be worse.

me: Really? Even for films like Toy Story?

V: Toy Story is good, but it is good children's entertainment. Calling something children's entertainment generally means it's bad, but that's only because this country doesn't care what it feeds its kids.